Mmmm.. Sexy | September 15, 2003

eos300d.jpg

The new Canon EOS 300D Digital SLR. One damn fine looking camera. I have no plans of swapping from film to digital, but if I did, this would be the baby I'd choose.

Posted at September 15, 2003 9:01 AM

Comments

jon hicks said on September 16, 2003 8:42 AM

The Angel on your left shoulder is saying: “Thats very sensible Andy - put all thoughts of it out of your head”

The Devil on your right shoulder is saying: “ANDYYY!!!! Sell everyyything you havvvee!!! BUY IT! BUY IT NOW!!!”

mat said on September 16, 2003 4:52 PM

Nah, the digital Leica that woman had at the BD4D thing last Friday, now that was a sexy camera!

http://www.leica-camera.com/digitalekameras/digilux1/index_e.html

Baasch said on September 17, 2003 7:18 PM

I’m very tempted to get the new Canon EOS-300D. It looks pretty sweet for the price. Anyone want to buy my Sony DCS-V1?

Andy Budd said on September 21, 2003 2:51 PM

Hi Mat,

That leica was a sexy camera, but at 700 I think it’s something purely for rich London new media types. I couldn’t justify that for a digital SLR, let alone a little point and shoot.

Rich said on September 22, 2003 5:49 PM

Andy, there aren’t any rich London new media types left!

But before you dismiss Leica out of hand purely on a cost basis (pah! it’s only money), it says here, “A person who reaches for a Leica is not just opting for a particular camera, but also for an exquisite new internal attitude that will affect this person’s way of taking pictures, it will even determine it.”

What I’d give for an exquisite new internal attitude.

Andy Budd said on September 22, 2003 6:47 PM

Next you’ll be telling me web designers in London have stopped sporting Hoxton fin’s, wearing Evisu Jeans and riding micro scooters.

I’m not falling for that one :-)